君吉實業

GoDEX RT200i vs Honeywell PC43t

Side-by-side comparison of barcode printers specs, hardware, and features to help you pick the right one for your use case.

Which one should you pick?

Both GoDEX RT200i and Honeywell PC43t are proven barcode printers options sold through JUNJI as an authorized distributor. GoDEX RT200i suits users who prioritize mid-range value with strong specs. Honeywell PC43t is a better fit for demanding environments and OEM-grade builds. Request a quote and we'll match you to the exact configuration for your workflow.

Full spec comparison

Specification
GoDEX
RT200i
Honeywell
PC43t
Print Method熱感式 / 熱轉印 (Direct Thermal / Thermal Transfer)熱感式 / 熱轉印 (Direct Thermal / Thermal Transfer)
Resolution203 dpi (8 dots/mm)203 dpi (8 dots/mm) 或 300 dpi (12 dots/mm)
Print Speed177 mm/s (7 ips)203 dpi: 最高 203 mm/s (8 ips); 300 dpi: 最高 152 mm/s (6 ips)
Print Width54 mm (2.12")203 dpi: 最大 104 mm (4.1"); 300 dpi: 最大 106 mm (4.2")
Max Print Length1,727 mm (68")
CPU32-bit RISC CPU
Memory16 MB SDRAM / 8 MB Flash (4 MB 使用者儲存)128 MB RAM / 128 MB Flash
Sensors標籤間距 (Gap) + 黑標 (Black Mark)反射式(黑標)+ 穿透式(間距)+ 印字頭開啟 + 碳帶感應器
Media Types連續紙 / 模切標籤 / 黑標 / 折頁捲筒或折頁:標籤 / 吊牌 / 模切 / 連續 / 黑標(熱感或熱轉印)
Media Roll OD最大 127 mm (5")最大 127 mm (5")
Media Core25.4 mm (1") / 38.1 mm (1.5")38 / 40 / 76 mm (1.5" / 1.57" / 3")
Ribbon Length最大 110 m (360')最長 300 m (984 ft)
Ribbon Width56 – 59 mm (2.20" – 2.32")最大 110 mm (4.33")
InterfaceUSB 2.0 (B-Type) + USB Host (A-Type) + RS-232 (DB-9) + Ethernet (RJ-45)標配 USB 2.0 + USB Host;選配 10/100 Ethernet + RS-232 Serial + 平行埠 + Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n + Bluetooth 2.1
Programming LanguageEZPL / GEPL / GZPLDirect Protocol (DP) / Fingerprint / IPL / DSim (DPL) / ESim (EPL) / ZSim2 (ZPL II)
Display彩色 TFT LCD + 導航按鍵 + 電源 / FEED / 校正鍵圖示 LED 介面或選配彩色 LCD(支援 10 國語言選單)
Media Width最大 118 mm (4.65")
Ribbon Core12.7 / 25.4 mm (0.5" / 1")
Power外接變壓器 100-240 VAC 50-60 Hz
Weight2.7 kg (5.9 lbs)
Dimensions281 × 227 × 182 mm (11.1 × 8.9 × 7.2")

Differences highlighted. Data source: JUNJI product catalog (21 spec rows compared).